Meta, released Sep 25, 2024

Llama-3.2-1Bprice, context, benchmarks and release details

Provisional: not enough results to rank yet Open weights 93% confidence 93 percent, High confidence, 2 of 4 expected sources in
32.1
SI Score
#138 of 142 ranked models
Input, per 1M tokens
not yet reported
Output, per 1M tokens
not yet reported
Context window
131Kmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Max output
8.2Kmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Released
Sep 25, 2024models.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗

How the score breaks down

Coding (weight 40 percent) —
Math (weight 15 percent) 0.6
Preference (weight 15 percent) 32.6
Reasoning (weight 30 percent) 23.9

Weights: reasoning 30%, math 15%, coding 40%, preference 15%. Results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging, and thin evidence is pulled toward 50. Method si-v3-retained-evidence-2, computed Oct 9, 2026, 05:13 UTC.

Around it on the leaderboard

  1. 136 Mistral Medium 3 33.0
  2. 137 Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct 32.7
  3. 138 Llama-3.2-1B 32.1
  4. 139 GPT-4.1 nano 32.1
  5. 140 GPT-4o 31.2

Full leaderboard

Benchmark results

3 benchmarks, 3 results

Each row shows the best published result. Where a model was tested at several settings, such as reasoning effort, open the row to see each one. Hover or tap a value for its source.

GPQA Diamondreasoning 23.9%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] Published Aug 30, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
23.9
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025math 0.6%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] Published Aug 30, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
0.6
LMArena Textpreference 1054.6 eloLMArena / ArenaPublished source fact [variant] text / overallPublished Oct 8, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY-4.0
Open source ↗
32.6

Normalization uses a fixed 0–100 scale for each unit, independent of other models. Compare evaluation conditions before reading a small gap as decisive. “Lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.

Details and sources

Open weights
Yesmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
License
Llama 3.2 Community Licensemodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Input modalities
textmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
First seen by SuperIndex
Oct 8, 2026
Coverage
75% of expected source weight

Reported (2)

  • Epoch AI BenchmarkingOct 8, 2026
  • LMArena / ArenaOct 8, 2026

Awaiting (2)

  • Official model cards via models.dev7% of weight
  • LiveBench19% of weight

Confidence rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models, so confidence reaches 100% at 80% of expected weight.

What changed

All releases · RSS feed

Alerts on this device

What to be alerted about
RSS feed