Xiaomi, released Sep 22, 2026

MiMo-V2.6-Proprice, context, benchmarks and release details

Provisional: not enough results to rank yet Open weights 88% confidence 88 percent, High confidence, 2 of 3 expected sources in
57.4
SI Score
#74 of 142 ranked models
Input, per 1M tokens
$0.43models.devFirst-party hosted API; MIT models.dev transcription. Provider documentation: https://platform.xiaomimimo.com/#/docs. Exact canonical endpoint; lowest short-context Standard USD token tier; cache/batch discounts excluded. Deprecated endpoints excluded; xiaomi/mimo-v2.6-pro Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Output, per 1M tokens
$0.87models.devFirst-party hosted API; MIT models.dev transcription. Provider documentation: https://platform.xiaomimimo.com/#/docs. Exact canonical endpoint; lowest short-context Standard USD token tier; cache/batch discounts excluded. Deprecated endpoints excluded; xiaomi/mimo-v2.6-pro Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Context window
1Mmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Max output
131Kmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Released
Sep 22, 2026models.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗

How the score breaks down

Coding (weight 40 percent) 62.4
Math (weight 15 percent) —
Preference (weight 15 percent) 81.1
Reasoning (weight 30 percent) —

Weights: reasoning 30%, math 15%, coding 40%, preference 15%. Results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging, and thin evidence is pulled toward 50. Method si-v3-retained-evidence-2, computed Oct 9, 2026, 05:13 UTC.

Around it on the leaderboard

  1. 72 MiniMax-M2.5 57.8
  2. 73 Grok 4.20 (Reasoning) 57.7
  3. 74 MiMo-V2.6-Pro 57.4
  4. 75 GPT-5.4 nano 57.4
  5. 76 GPT-5.4 mini 56.9

Full leaderboard

Benchmark results

3 benchmarks, 3 results

Each row shows the best published result. Where a model was tested at several settings, such as reasoning effort, open the row to see each one. Hover or tap a value for its source.

Terminal-Bench 2.1coding 89.9%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric score; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] MiMo-V2.6 Pro comparison column; 2.1 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription
Open source ↗
89.9
Terminal-Bench 4.0coding 34.9%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric score; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] MiMo-V2.6 Pro comparison column; 4.0 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription
Open source ↗
34.9
LMArena Textpreference 1491.7 eloLMArena / ArenaPublished source fact [variant] text / overallPublished Oct 8, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY-4.0
Open source ↗
81.1

Normalization uses a fixed 0–100 scale for each unit, independent of other models. Compare evaluation conditions before reading a small gap as decisive. “Lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.

Details and sources

Open weights
Yesmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
License
not yet reported
Input modalities
text, image, audio, videomodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
First seen by SuperIndex
Oct 8, 2026
Coverage
70% of expected source weight

Reported (2)

  • Official model cards via models.devOct 8, 2026
  • LMArena / ArenaOct 8, 2026

Awaiting (1)

  • LiveBench30% of weight

Confidence rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models, so confidence reaches 100% at 80% of expected weight.

What changed

All releases · RSS feed

Alerts on this device

What to be alerted about
RSS feed