Alibaba / Qwen, released Aug 3, 2026
Qwen3.8 Maxprice, context, benchmarks and release details
- Input, per 1M tokens
- $1.65Alibaba Model Studio pricingOfficial Alibaba Model Studio Global USD on-demand API; 0<Token≤1M; Non-Thinking and Thinking modes. Output uses non-thinking rate when both modes are available; thinking-only products use their thinking rate. Cache, Batch, free quotas and regional rates excluded
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Output, per 1M tokens
- $4.95Alibaba Model Studio pricingOfficial Alibaba Model Studio Global USD on-demand API; 0<Token≤1M; Non-Thinking and Thinking modes. Output uses non-thinking rate when both modes are available; thinking-only products use their thinking rate. Cache, Batch, free quotas and regional rates excluded
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Context window
- 1Mmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Max output
- 131Kmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Released
- Aug 3, 2026models.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
How the score breaks down
Weights: reasoning 30%, math 15%, coding 40%, preference 15%. Results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging, and thin evidence is pulled toward 50. Method si-v3-retained-evidence-2, computed Oct 9, 2026, 06:15 UTC.
Around it on the leaderboard
- 16 GPT-6 Sol 68.9
- 17 Gemini 3.8 Flash 68.8
- 18 Qwen3.8 Max 68.7
- 19 Gemini 3.5 Flash 68.3
- 20 Claude Sonnet 4.6 68.3
Benchmark results
25 benchmarks, 26 resultsEach row shows the best published result. Where a model was tested at several settings, such as reasoning effort, open the row to see each one. Hover or tap a value for its source.
GPQA Diamondreasoning 92.7%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] xhighPublished Aug 4, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
92.7 2 settings
- xhigh effort 92.7%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] xhighPublished Aug 4, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - Setting 2 92.6%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric score; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant]
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription
Open source ↗
Open source ↗ 43.6
Open source ↗ 56.2
Open source ↗ 94.5
Open source ↗ 87.1
Open source ↗ 74.0
Open source ↗ 100.0
Open source ↗ 78.8
Open source ↗ 100.0
Open source ↗ 46.3
Open source ↗ 74.7
Open source ↗ 98.0
Open source ↗ 95.1
Open source ↗ 81.0
Open source ↗ 91.2
Open source ↗ 67.3
Open source ↗ 99.4
Open source ↗ 73.9
Open source ↗ 71.8
Open source ↗ 77.3
Open source ↗ 60.0
Open source ↗ 56.7
Open source ↗ 67.7
Open source ↗ 86.6
Open source ↗ 80.5
Normalization uses a fixed 0–100 scale for each unit, independent of other models. Compare evaluation conditions before reading a small gap as decisive. “Lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.
Details and sources
- Open weights
- Nomodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - License
- not yet reported
- Input modalities
- text, image, video, pdfmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - First seen by SuperIndex
- Oct 8, 2026
- Coverage
- 68% of expected source weight
Reported (4)
- Epoch AI BenchmarkingOct 8, 2026
- Official model cards via models.devOct 8, 2026
- LiveBenchOct 8, 2026
- LMArena / ArenaOct 8, 2026
Awaiting (3)
- ARC Prize13% of weight
- Humanity’s Last Exam13% of weight
- Terminal-Bench6% of weight
Confidence rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models, so confidence reaches 100% at 80% of expected weight.