Meta, released Apr 8, 2026
Muse Spark 1.1price, context, benchmarks and release details
- Input, per 1M tokens
- $1.25Meta API pricingOfficial Meta Standard tier; applies only to the versions explicitly listed by the provider. Contributor training-data-discount tier and cached input excluded
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Output, per 1M tokens
- $4.25Meta API pricingOfficial Meta Standard tier; applies only to the versions explicitly listed by the provider. Contributor training-data-discount tier and cached input excluded
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Context window
- 1Mmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Max output
- 131Kmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Released
- Apr 8, 2026models.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
How the score breaks down
Weights: reasoning 30%, math 15%, coding 40%, preference 15%. Results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging, and thin evidence is pulled toward 50. Method si-v3-retained-evidence-2, computed Oct 9, 2026, 05:13 UTC.
Around it on the leaderboard
- 45 Gemma 4 31B IT 63.0
- 46 DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 63.0
- 47 Muse Spark 1.1 62.9
- 48 Qwen3.7 Plus 62.7
- 49 Qwen3.5 35B-A3B 62.7
Benchmark results
21 benchmarks, 21 resultsEach row shows the best published result. Where a model was tested at several settings, such as reasoning effort, open the row to see each one. Hover or tap a value for its source.
Open source ↗ 62.1
Open source ↗ 98.0
Open source ↗ 71.1
Open source ↗ 78.0
Open source ↗ 100.0
Open source ↗ 76.9
Open source ↗ 96.0
Open source ↗ 82.0
Open source ↗ 96.1
Open source ↗ 83.0
Open source ↗ 87.5
Open source ↗ 65.7
Open source ↗ 78.3
Open source ↗ 76.1
Open source ↗ 77.3
Open source ↗ 55.0
Open source ↗ 43.3
Open source ↗ 61.5
Open source ↗ 51.5
Open source ↗ 80.0
Open source ↗ 80.1
Normalization uses a fixed 0–100 scale for each unit, independent of other models. Compare evaluation conditions before reading a small gap as decisive. “Lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.
Details and sources
- Open weights
- Nomodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - License
- not yet reported
- Input modalities
- text, image, pdf, videomodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - First seen by SuperIndex
- Oct 8, 2026
- Coverage
- 49% of expected source weight
Reported (4)
- Official model cards via models.devOct 8, 2026
- LiveBenchOct 8, 2026
- LMArena / ArenaOct 8, 2026
- SWE-bench Pro (public)Oct 8, 2026
Awaiting (4)
- ARC Prize11% of weight
- Epoch AI Benchmarking23% of weight
- Humanity’s Last Exam11% of weight
- Terminal-Bench6% of weight
Confidence rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models, so confidence reaches 100% at 80% of expected weight.