Google, released Apr 2, 2026

Gemma 4 31B ITprice, context, benchmarks and release details

Provisional: not enough results to rank yet Open weights 64% confidence 64 percent, Medium confidence, 2 of 7 expected sources in
63.0
SI Score
#45 of 142 ranked models
Input, per 1M tokens
$0.00LiteLLMFirst-party API Standard token rate; MIT LiteLLM transcription. Provider documentation: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing. Exact endpoint only; cache/batch/long-context rates excluded Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Output, per 1M tokens
$0.00LiteLLMFirst-party API Standard token rate; MIT LiteLLM transcription. Provider documentation: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing. Exact endpoint only; cache/batch/long-context rates excluded Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Context window
262Kmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Max output
32.8Kmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Released
Apr 2, 2026models.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗

How the score breaks down

Coding (weight 40 percent) —
Math (weight 15 percent) 73.3
Preference (weight 15 percent) 77.1
Reasoning (weight 30 percent) 75.8

Weights: reasoning 30%, math 15%, coding 40%, preference 15%. Results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging, and thin evidence is pulled toward 50. Method si-v3-retained-evidence-2, computed Oct 9, 2026, 05:13 UTC.

Around it on the leaderboard

  1. 43 GLM-5.1 63.3
  2. 44 DeepSeek V4 Pro 63.1
  3. 45 Gemma 4 31B IT 63.0
  4. 46 DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 63.0
  5. 47 Muse Spark 1.1 62.9

Full leaderboard

Benchmark results

3 benchmarks, 3 results

Each row shows the best published result. Where a model was tested at several settings, such as reasoning effort, open the row to see each one. Hover or tap a value for its source.

GPQA Diamondreasoning 75.8%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] minimalPublished Aug 6, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
75.8
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025math 73.3%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] minimalPublished Aug 6, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
73.3
LMArena Textpreference 1443.0 eloLMArena / ArenaPublished source fact [variant] text / overallPublished Oct 8, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY-4.0
Open source ↗
77.1

Normalization uses a fixed 0–100 scale for each unit, independent of other models. Compare evaluation conditions before reading a small gap as decisive. “Lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.

Details and sources

Open weights
Yesmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
License
not yet reported
Input modalities
text, imagemodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
First seen by SuperIndex
Oct 8, 2026
Coverage
51% of expected source weight

Reported (2)

  • Epoch AI BenchmarkingOct 8, 2026
  • LMArena / ArenaOct 8, 2026

Awaiting (5)

  • ARC Prize13% of weight
  • Humanity’s Last Exam13% of weight
  • Official model cards via models.dev4% of weight
  • LiveBench13% of weight
  • Terminal-Bench6% of weight

Confidence rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models, so confidence reaches 100% at 80% of expected weight.

What changed

All releases · RSS feed

Alerts on this device

What to be alerted about
RSS feed