Meta, released Sep 2, 2026
Muse Spark 1.3price, context, benchmarks and release details
- Input, per 1M tokens
- $1.25Meta API pricingOfficial Meta Standard tier; applies only to the versions explicitly listed by the provider. Contributor training-data-discount tier and cached input excluded
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Output, per 1M tokens
- $4.25Meta API pricingOfficial Meta Standard tier; applies only to the versions explicitly listed by the provider. Contributor training-data-discount tier and cached input excluded
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Context window
- 1Mmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Max output
- 131Kmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Released
- Sep 2, 2026models.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
How the score breaks down
Weights: reasoning 30%, math 15%, coding 40%, preference 15%. Results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging, and thin evidence is pulled toward 50. Method si-v3-retained-evidence-2, computed Oct 9, 2026, 05:13 UTC.
Around it on the leaderboard
- 9 Kimi K3 71.0
- 10 Claude Opus 4.6 70.8
- 11 Muse Spark 1.3 70.1
- 12 Gemini 3.7 Flash 70.0
- 13 GPT-5.4 69.7
Benchmark results
22 benchmarks, 24 resultsEach row shows the best published result. Where a model was tested at several settings, such as reasoning effort, open the row to see each one. Hover or tap a value for its source.
Open source ↗ 94.0
Open source ↗ 90.5
Open source ↗ 76.0
Open source ↗ 100.0
Open source ↗ 84.6
Open source ↗ 98.0
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v2)math 46.3%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] maxPublished Sep 18, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
46.3 2 settings
- xhigh effort 41.5%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] xhighPublished Sep 16, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - max effort 46.3%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] maxPublished Sep 18, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 (v2)math 74.4%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] xhighPublished Sep 16, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
74.4 2 settings
- xhigh effort 74.4%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] xhighPublished Sep 16, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - max effort 74.0%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] maxPublished Sep 18, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
Open source ↗ 99.0
Open source ↗ 97.1
Open source ↗ 96.0
Open source ↗ 91.7
Open source ↗ 72.5
Open source ↗ 99.2
Open source ↗ 80.4
Open source ↗ 81.7
Open source ↗ 77.3
Open source ↗ 55.0
Open source ↗ 60.0
Open source ↗ 88.8
Open source ↗ 14.6
Open source ↗ 81.0
Normalization uses a fixed 0–100 scale for each unit, independent of other models. Compare evaluation conditions before reading a small gap as decisive. “Lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.
Details and sources
- Open weights
- Nomodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - License
- not yet reported
- Input modalities
- text, image, video, pdf, audiomodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - First seen by SuperIndex
- Oct 8, 2026
- Coverage
- 75% of expected source weight
Reported (5)
- Epoch AI BenchmarkingOct 8, 2026
- Official model cards via models.devOct 8, 2026
- LiveBenchOct 8, 2026
- LMArena / ArenaOct 8, 2026
- Terminal-BenchOct 8, 2026
Awaiting (2)
- ARC Prize13% of weight
- Humanity’s Last Exam13% of weight
Confidence rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models, so confidence reaches 100% at 80% of expected weight.