Anthropic, released Feb 5, 2026
Claude Opus 4.6price, context, benchmarks and release details
- Input, per 1M tokens
- $5.00Anthropic API pricingOfficial Claude API base tokens; lowest short-context global Standard rate; cache, batch, fast and regional premiums excluded
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Output, per 1M tokens
- $25.00Anthropic API pricingOfficial Claude API base tokens; lowest short-context global Standard rate; cache, batch, fast and regional premiums excluded
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Context window
- 1Mmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Max output
- 128Kmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Released
- Feb 5, 2026models.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
How the score breaks down
Weights: reasoning 30%, math 15%, coding 40%, preference 15%. Results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging, and thin evidence is pulled toward 50. Method si-v3-retained-evidence-2, computed Oct 9, 2026, 05:13 UTC.
Around it on the leaderboard
- 8 Claude Opus 4.7 71.2
- 9 Kimi K3 71.0
- 10 Claude Opus 4.6 70.8
- 11 Muse Spark 1.3 70.1
- 12 Gemini 3.7 Flash 70.0
Benchmark results
28 benchmarks, 46 resultsEach row shows the best published result. Where a model was tested at several settings, such as reasoning effort, open the row to see each one. Hover or tap a value for its source.
ARC-AGI-1 (public eval)reasoning 96.8%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with a 120K thinking budget and a maximum context window of 128K tokens and 'max' output effort. [variant] claude-opus-4-6-thinking-120K-maxPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
96.8 4 settings
- Setting 1 96.3%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with a 120K thinking budget and a maximum context window of 128K tokens and 'high' output effort. [variant] claude-opus-4-6-thinking-120K-highPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 2 89.6%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with a 120K thinking budget and a maximum context window of 128K tokens and 'low' output effort. [variant] claude-opus-4-6-thinking-120K-lowPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 3 96.8%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with a 120K thinking budget and a maximum context window of 128K tokens and 'max' output effort. [variant] claude-opus-4-6-thinking-120K-maxPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 4 94.8%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with a 120K thinking budget and a maximum context window of 128K tokens and 'medium' output effort. [variant] claude-opus-4-6-thinking-120K-mediumPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
ARC-AGI-1 (semi-private)reasoning 94%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with a 120K thinking budget and a maximum context window of 128K tokens and 'high' output effort. [variant] claude-opus-4-6-thinking-120K-highPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
94.0 4 settings
- Setting 1 94%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with a 120K thinking budget and a maximum context window of 128K tokens and 'high' output effort. [variant] claude-opus-4-6-thinking-120K-highPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 2 86%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with a 120K thinking budget and a maximum context window of 128K tokens and 'low' output effort. [variant] claude-opus-4-6-thinking-120K-lowPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 3 93%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with a 120K thinking budget and a maximum context window of 128K tokens and 'max' output effort. [variant] claude-opus-4-6-thinking-120K-maxPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 4 92%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with a 120K thinking budget and a maximum context window of 128K tokens and 'medium' output effort. [variant] claude-opus-4-6-thinking-120K-mediumPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
ARC-AGI-2 (public eval)reasoning 79.0%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with a 120K thinking budget and a maximum context window of 128K tokens and 'high' output effort. [variant] claude-opus-4-6-thinking-120K-highPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
79.0 4 settings
- Setting 1 79.0%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with a 120K thinking budget and a maximum context window of 128K tokens and 'high' output effort. [variant] claude-opus-4-6-thinking-120K-highPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 2 59.9%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with a 120K thinking budget and a maximum context window of 128K tokens and 'low' output effort. [variant] claude-opus-4-6-thinking-120K-lowPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 3 74.9%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with a 120K thinking budget and a maximum context window of 128K tokens and 'max' output effort. [variant] claude-opus-4-6-thinking-120K-maxPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 4 73.6%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with a 120K thinking budget and a maximum context window of 128K tokens and 'medium' output effort. [variant] claude-opus-4-6-thinking-120K-mediumPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
ARC-AGI-2 (semi-private)reasoning 69.2%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with a 120K thinking budget and a maximum context window of 128K tokens and 'high' output effort. [variant] claude-opus-4-6-thinking-120K-highPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
69.2 4 settings
- Setting 1 69.2%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with a 120K thinking budget and a maximum context window of 128K tokens and 'high' output effort. [variant] claude-opus-4-6-thinking-120K-highPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 2 64.6%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with a 120K thinking budget and a maximum context window of 128K tokens and 'low' output effort. [variant] claude-opus-4-6-thinking-120K-lowPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 3 68.8%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with a 120K thinking budget and a maximum context window of 128K tokens and 'max' output effort. [variant] claude-opus-4-6-thinking-120K-maxPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 4 66.3%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with a 120K thinking budget and a maximum context window of 128K tokens and 'medium' output effort. [variant] claude-opus-4-6-thinking-120K-mediumPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
GPQA Diamondreasoning 90.5%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] 32KPublished Feb 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
90.5 3 settings
- max effort 88.4%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] maxPublished Aug 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - 32K thinking 90.5%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] 32KPublished Feb 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - 64K thinking 88.8%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] 64KPublished Feb 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
Open source ↗ 19.0
Open source ↗ 99.3
Open source ↗ 63.5
Open source ↗ 80.0
Open source ↗ 98.0
Open source ↗ 82.7
Open source ↗ 94.0
Open source ↗ 26.8
Open source ↗ 66.0
Open source ↗ 97.0
Open source ↗ 95.1
Open source ↗ 73.0
Open source ↗ 92.2
Open source ↗ 59.1
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025math 94.4%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] 64KPublished Feb 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
94.4 3 settings
- max effort 91.1%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] maxPublished Aug 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - 32K thinking 93.1%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] 32KPublished Feb 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - 64K thinking 94.4%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] 64KPublished Feb 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
Open source ↗ 76.1
Open source ↗ 80.3
Open source ↗ 63.6
Open source ↗ 50.0
Open source ↗ 33.3
SWE-bench Pro (public)coding 51.9%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric resolve rate; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] public
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription
Open source ↗
51.9 2 settings
- Setting 1 51.9%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric resolve rate; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] public
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription
Open source ↗ - Setting 2 47.1%SWE-bench Pro (public)Published steward score [variant] Published Apr 8, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
SWE-bench Verifiedcoding 78.7%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] Published Feb 18, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
78.7 2 settings
- Setting 1 78.7%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] Published Feb 18, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - Setting 2 75.6%SWE-bench VerifiedSWE-bench published model plus agent result; harness retained, not a base model evaluation [variant] mini-SWE-agent; 2.0.0Published Feb 17, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
Open source ↗ 81.6
Normalization uses a fixed 0–100 scale for each unit, independent of other models. Compare evaluation conditions before reading a small gap as decisive. “Lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.
Details and sources
- Open weights
- Nomodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - License
- not yet reported
- Input modalities
- text, image, pdfmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - First seen by SuperIndex
- Oct 8, 2026
- Coverage
- 95% of expected source weight
Reported (8)
- ARC PrizeOct 8, 2026
- Epoch AI BenchmarkingOct 8, 2026
- Humanity’s Last ExamOct 8, 2026
- Official model cards via models.devOct 8, 2026
- LiveBenchOct 8, 2026
- LMArena / ArenaOct 8, 2026
- SWE-bench VerifiedOct 8, 2026
- SWE-bench Pro (public)Oct 8, 2026
Awaiting (1)
- Terminal-Bench5% of weight
Confidence rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models, so confidence reaches 100% at 80% of expected weight.