OpenAI, released Apr 14, 2025
GPT-4.1price, context, benchmarks and release details
- Input, per 1M tokens
- $2.00models.devFirst-party hosted API; MIT models.dev transcription. Provider documentation: https://platform.openai.com/docs/models. Exact canonical endpoint; lowest short-context Standard USD token tier; cache/batch discounts excluded. Deprecated endpoints excluded; openai/gpt-4.1
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Output, per 1M tokens
- $8.00models.devFirst-party hosted API; MIT models.dev transcription. Provider documentation: https://platform.openai.com/docs/models. Exact canonical endpoint; lowest short-context Standard USD token tier; cache/batch discounts excluded. Deprecated endpoints excluded; openai/gpt-4.1
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Context window
- 1Mmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Max output
- 32.8Kmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Released
- Apr 14, 2025models.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
How the score breaks down
Weights: reasoning 30%, math 15%, coding 40%, preference 15%. Results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging, and thin evidence is pulled toward 50. Method si-v3-retained-evidence-2, computed Oct 9, 2026, 05:13 UTC.
Around it on the leaderboard
- 122 Gemma 3 27B IT 42.0
- 123 o3-mini 41.6
- 124 GPT-4.1 41.5
- 125 Claude Haiku 3.5 40.8
- 126 Claude Haiku 3 39.9
Benchmark results
12 benchmarks, 13 resultsEach row shows the best published result. Where a model was tested at several settings, such as reasoning effort, open the row to see each one. Hover or tap a value for its source.
Open source ↗ 11.8
Open source ↗ 5.5
Open source ↗ 0.0
Open source ↗ 0.4
Open source ↗ 66.9
Open source ↗ 5.4
Open source ↗ 6.0
Open source ↗ 83.0
Open source ↗ 38.3
Open source ↗ 52.4
SWE-bench Verifiedcoding 48.5%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] Published Feb 8, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
48.5 2 settings
- Setting 1 48.5%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] Published Feb 8, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - Setting 2 39.6%SWE-bench VerifiedSWE-bench published model plus agent result; harness retained, not a base model evaluation [variant] mini-SWE-agent; 1.0.0Published Jul 26, 2025
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
Open source ↗ 71.4
Normalization uses a fixed 0–100 scale for each unit, independent of other models. Compare evaluation conditions before reading a small gap as decisive. “Lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.
Details and sources
- Open weights
- Nomodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - License
- not yet reported
- Input modalities
- text, image, pdfmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - First seen by SuperIndex
- Oct 8, 2026
- Coverage
- 80% of expected source weight
Reported (6)
- Aider polyglotOct 8, 2026
- ARC PrizeOct 8, 2026
- Epoch AI BenchmarkingOct 8, 2026
- Humanity’s Last ExamOct 8, 2026
- LMArena / ArenaOct 8, 2026
- SWE-bench VerifiedOct 8, 2026
Awaiting (3)
- Official model cards via models.dev4% of weight
- LiveBench11% of weight
- Terminal-Bench5% of weight
Confidence rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models, so confidence reaches 100% at 80% of expected weight.