Anthropic, released Mar 13, 2024

Claude Haiku 3price, context, benchmarks and release details

Provisional: not enough results to rank yet 93% confidence, 2 of 4 expected sources in

39.9

SI Score

#126 of 142 ranked models

Input, per 1M tokens: not yet reported
Output, per 1M tokens: not yet reported
Context window: 200K
Max output: 4.1K
Released: Mar 13, 2024

How the score breaks down

Coding —

Math 10.5

Preference 49.3

Reasoning 36.3

Weights: reasoning 30%, math 15%, coding 40%, preference 15%. Results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging, and thin evidence is pulled toward 50. Method si-v3-retained-evidence-2, computed Oct 9, 2026, 05:13 UTC.

Around it on the leaderboard

124 GPT-4.1 41.5
125 Claude Haiku 3.5 40.8
126 Claude Haiku 3 39.9
127 Qwen2.5-Coder-32B-Instruct 39.6
128 Gemma 3 4B IT 39.2

Full leaderboard

Benchmark results

4 benchmarks, 4 results

Each row shows the best published result. Where a model was tested at several settings, such as reasoning effort, open the row to see each one. Hover or tap a value for its source.

GPQA Diamondreasoning 36.3% 36.3

MATH Level 5math 14.9% 14.9

OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025math 1.8% 1.8

LMArena Textpreference 1194.7 elo 49.3

Normalization uses a fixed 0–100 scale for each unit, independent of other models. Compare evaluation conditions before reading a small gap as decisive. “Lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.

Details and sources

Open weights: No
License: not yet reported
Input modalities: text, image, pdf
First seen by SuperIndex: Oct 8, 2026
Coverage: 75% of expected source weight

Reported (2)

Epoch AI BenchmarkingOct 8, 2026
LMArena / ArenaOct 8, 2026

Awaiting (2)

Official model cards via models.dev7% of weight
LiveBench19% of weight

Confidence rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models, so confidence reaches 100% at 80% of expected weight.