Alibaba / Qwen, released Feb 23, 2026

Qwen3.5 27Bprice, context, benchmarks and release details

Provisional: not enough results to rank yet Open weights 37% confidence 37 percent, Low confidence, 2 of 7 expected sources in
56.8
SI Score
Not ranked yet
Input, per 1M tokens
$0.09Alibaba Model Studio pricingOfficial Alibaba Model Studio Global USD on-demand API; 0<Token≤128K; . Output uses non-thinking rate when both modes are available; thinking-only products use their thinking rate. Cache, Batch, free quotas and regional rates excluded Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
Output, per 1M tokens
$0.69Alibaba Model Studio pricingOfficial Alibaba Model Studio Global USD on-demand API; 0<Token≤128K; . Output uses non-thinking rate when both modes are available; thinking-only products use their thinking rate. Cache, Batch, free quotas and regional rates excluded Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
Context window
262Kmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Max output
65.5Kmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Released
Feb 23, 2026models.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗

How the score breaks down

Coding (weight 40 percent) 72.4
Math (weight 15 percent) —
Preference (weight 15 percent) 74.0
Reasoning (weight 30 percent) —

Weights: reasoning 30%, math 15%, coding 40%, preference 15%. Results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging, and thin evidence is pulled toward 50. Method si-v3-retained-evidence-2, computed Oct 9, 2026, 06:15 UTC.

Around it on the leaderboard

  1. 1 Claude Fable 5.1 80.2
  2. 2 Claude Opus 5.5 78.4
  3. 3 GPT-6 Astra 77.5
  4. 4 Claude Fable 5 76.8
  5. 5 Claude Opus 5 74.9

Full leaderboard

Benchmark results

2 benchmarks, 2 results

Each row shows the best published result. Where a model was tested at several settings, such as reasoning effort, open the row to see each one. Hover or tap a value for its source.

SWE-bench Verifiedcoding 72.4%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric resolved; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription
Open source ↗
72.4
LMArena Textpreference 1408.9 eloLMArena / ArenaPublished source fact [variant] text / overallPublished Oct 8, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY-4.0
Open source ↗
74.0

Normalization uses a fixed 0–100 scale for each unit, independent of other models. Compare evaluation conditions before reading a small gap as decisive. “Lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.

Details and sources

Open weights
Yesmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
License
not yet reported
Input modalities
text, image, video, audiomodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
First seen by SuperIndex
Oct 8, 2026
Coverage
30% of expected source weight

Reported (2)

  • Official model cards via models.devOct 8, 2026
  • LMArena / ArenaOct 8, 2026

Awaiting (5)

  • ARC Prize13% of weight
  • Epoch AI Benchmarking25% of weight
  • Humanity’s Last Exam13% of weight
  • LiveBench13% of weight
  • Terminal-Bench6% of weight

Confidence rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models, so confidence reaches 100% at 80% of expected weight.

What changed

All releases · RSS feed

Alerts on this device

What to be alerted about
RSS feed