Anthropic, released Jul 24, 2026
Claude Opus 5price, context, benchmarks and release details
- Input, per 1M tokens
- $5.00Anthropic API pricingOfficial Claude API base tokens; lowest short-context global Standard rate; cache, batch, fast and regional premiums excluded
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Output, per 1M tokens
- $25.00Anthropic API pricingOfficial Claude API base tokens; lowest short-context global Standard rate; cache, batch, fast and regional premiums excluded
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Context window
- 1Mmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Max output
- 128Kmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Released
- Jul 24, 2026models.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
How the score breaks down
Weights: reasoning 30%, math 15%, coding 40%, preference 15%. Results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging, and thin evidence is pulled toward 50. Method si-v3-retained-evidence-2, computed Oct 9, 2026, 05:13 UTC.
Around it on the leaderboard
- 3 GPT-6 Astra 77.5
- 4 Claude Fable 5 76.8
- 5 Claude Opus 5 74.9
- 6 GPT-6.1 Sol 73.0
- 7 GPT-5.6 Sol 72.1
Benchmark results
34 benchmarks, 46 resultsEach row shows the best published result. Where a model was tested at several settings, such as reasoning effort, open the row to see each one. Hover or tap a value for its source.
Open source ↗ 97.5
ARC-AGI-1 (public eval)reasoning 99%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with 'high' output effort. [variant] anthropic-claude-opus-5-highPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
99.0 2 settings
- high effort 99%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with 'high' output effort. [variant] anthropic-claude-opus-5-highPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - max effort 99%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with 'max' output effort. [variant] anthropic-claude-opus-5-maxPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
ARC-AGI-1 (semi-private)reasoning 97.5%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with 'high' output effort. [variant] anthropic-claude-opus-5-highPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
97.5 2 settings
- high effort 97.5%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with 'high' output effort. [variant] anthropic-claude-opus-5-highPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - max effort 97.5%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with 'max' output effort. [variant] anthropic-claude-opus-5-maxPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
Open source ↗ 90.4
ARC-AGI-2 (public eval)reasoning 97.1%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with 'max' output effort. [variant] anthropic-claude-opus-5-maxPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
97.1 2 settings
- high effort 93.2%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with 'high' output effort. [variant] anthropic-claude-opus-5-highPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - max effort 97.1%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with 'max' output effort. [variant] anthropic-claude-opus-5-maxPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
ARC-AGI-2 (semi-private)reasoning 90.4%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with 'max' output effort. [variant] anthropic-claude-opus-5-maxPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
90.4 2 settings
- high effort 88.3%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with 'high' output effort. [variant] anthropic-claude-opus-5-highPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - max effort 90.4%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with 'max' output effort. [variant] anthropic-claude-opus-5-maxPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
Open source ↗ 30.2
Open source ↗ 30.2
GPQA Diamondreasoning 93.9%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] maxPublished Jul 24, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
93.9 3 settings
- low effort 87.9%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] lowPublished Aug 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - max effort 93.9%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] maxPublished Jul 24, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - Setting 3 92.9%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] Published Aug 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
Open source ↗ 56.3
Open source ↗ 64.7
Open source ↗ 99.3
Open source ↗ 77.6
Open source ↗ 86.0
Open source ↗ 100.0
Open source ↗ 78.8
Open source ↗ 100.0
Open source ↗ 73.2
Open source ↗ 85.6
Open source ↗ 99.0
Open source ↗ 94.1
Open source ↗ 97.0
Open source ↗ 92.8
Open source ↗ 61.6
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025math 98.9%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] maxPublished Jul 24, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
98.9 3 settings
- low effort 93.3%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] lowPublished Aug 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - max effort 98.9%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] maxPublished Jul 24, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - Setting 3 97.8%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] Published Aug 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
Open source ↗ 82.6
Open source ↗ 80.3
Open source ↗ 77.3
Open source ↗ 75.0
Open source ↗ 43.3
Open source ↗ 79.2
Open source ↗ 96.0
Terminal-Bench 4.0coding 53.9%Terminal-BenchTerminal-Bench 4.0; published harness submission, 95% CI retained at source [variant] Claude Code; xhighPublished Sep 17, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · Apache-2.0; factual citation
Open source ↗
53.9 5 settings
- Setting 1 50.3%Terminal-BenchTerminal-Bench 4.0; published harness submission, 95% CI retained at source [variant] Claude Code; highPublished Sep 17, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · Apache-2.0; factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 2 34.9%Terminal-BenchTerminal-Bench 4.0; published harness submission, 95% CI retained at source [variant] Claude Code; lowPublished Sep 17, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · Apache-2.0; factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 3 51.8%Terminal-BenchTerminal-Bench 4.0; published harness submission, 95% CI retained at source [variant] Claude Code; maxPublished Sep 3, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · Apache-2.0; factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 4 44.9%Terminal-BenchTerminal-Bench 4.0; published harness submission, 95% CI retained at source [variant] Claude Code; mediumPublished Sep 17, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · Apache-2.0; factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 5 53.9%Terminal-BenchTerminal-Bench 4.0; published harness submission, 95% CI retained at source [variant] Claude Code; xhighPublished Sep 17, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · Apache-2.0; factual citation
Open source ↗
Open source ↗ 82.0
Normalization uses a fixed 0–100 scale for each unit, independent of other models. Compare evaluation conditions before reading a small gap as decisive. “Lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.
Details and sources
- Open weights
- Nomodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - License
- not yet reported
- Input modalities
- text, image, pdfmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - First seen by SuperIndex
- Oct 8, 2026
- Coverage
- 87% of expected source weight
Reported (6)
- ARC PrizeOct 8, 2026
- Epoch AI BenchmarkingOct 8, 2026
- Official model cards via models.devOct 8, 2026
- LiveBenchOct 8, 2026
- LMArena / ArenaOct 8, 2026
- Terminal-BenchOct 8, 2026
Awaiting (1)
- Humanity’s Last Exam13% of weight
Confidence rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models, so confidence reaches 100% at 80% of expected weight.