OpenAI, released Dec 11, 2025
GPT-5.2price, context, benchmarks and release details
- Input, per 1M tokens
- $1.75models.devFirst-party hosted API; MIT models.dev transcription. Provider documentation: https://platform.openai.com/docs/models. Exact canonical endpoint; lowest short-context Standard USD token tier; cache/batch discounts excluded. Deprecated endpoints excluded; openai/gpt-5.2
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Output, per 1M tokens
- $14.00models.devFirst-party hosted API; MIT models.dev transcription. Provider documentation: https://platform.openai.com/docs/models. Exact canonical endpoint; lowest short-context Standard USD token tier; cache/batch discounts excluded. Deprecated endpoints excluded; openai/gpt-5.2
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Context window
- 400Kmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Max output
- 128Kmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Released
- Dec 11, 2025OpenAI API changelogPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
How the score breaks down
Weights: reasoning 30%, math 15%, coding 40%, preference 15%. Results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging, and thin evidence is pulled toward 50. Method si-v3-retained-evidence-2, computed Oct 9, 2026, 05:13 UTC.
Around it on the leaderboard
- 31 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 66.2
- 32 Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo 66.1
- 33 GPT-5.2 65.9
- 34 GLM-5.2 65.7
- 35 Gemini 3.6 Flash 65.5
Benchmark results
28 benchmarks, 56 resultsEach row shows the best published result. Where a model was tested at several settings, such as reasoning effort, open the row to see each one. Hover or tap a value for its source.
ARC-AGI-1 (public eval)reasoning 95%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. [variant] gpt-5-2-2025-12-11-thinking-xhighPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
95.0 5 settings
- Setting 1 90.3%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. [variant] gpt-5-2-2025-12-11-thinking-highPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 2 65.9%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. [variant] gpt-5-2-2025-12-11-thinking-lowPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 3 80.6%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. [variant] gpt-5-2-2025-12-11-thinking-mediumPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 4 16.5%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. [variant] gpt-5-2-2025-12-11-thinking-nonePublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 5 95%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. [variant] gpt-5-2-2025-12-11-thinking-xhighPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
ARC-AGI-1 (semi-private)reasoning 86.2%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. [variant] gpt-5-2-2025-12-11-thinking-xhighPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
86.2 5 settings
- Setting 1 78.7%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. [variant] gpt-5-2-2025-12-11-thinking-highPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 2 55.7%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. [variant] gpt-5-2-2025-12-11-thinking-lowPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 3 72.7%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. [variant] gpt-5-2-2025-12-11-thinking-mediumPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 4 12.3%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. [variant] gpt-5-2-2025-12-11-thinking-nonePublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 5 86.2%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. [variant] gpt-5-2-2025-12-11-thinking-xhighPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
ARC-AGI-2 (public eval)reasoning 59.8%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. [variant] gpt-5-2-2025-12-11-thinking-xhighPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
59.8 5 settings
- Setting 1 39.9%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. [variant] gpt-5-2-2025-12-11-thinking-highPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 2 8.3%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. [variant] gpt-5-2-2025-12-11-thinking-lowPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 3 27.6%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. [variant] gpt-5-2-2025-12-11-thinking-mediumPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 4 0%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. [variant] gpt-5-2-2025-12-11-thinking-nonePublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 5 59.8%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. [variant] gpt-5-2-2025-12-11-thinking-xhighPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
ARC-AGI-2 (semi-private)reasoning 52.9%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. [variant] gpt-5-2-2025-12-11-thinking-xhighPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
52.9 5 settings
- Setting 1 43.3%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. [variant] gpt-5-2-2025-12-11-thinking-highPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 2 9.7%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. [variant] gpt-5-2-2025-12-11-thinking-lowPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 3 26.7%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. [variant] gpt-5-2-2025-12-11-thinking-mediumPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 4 0.8%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. [variant] gpt-5-2-2025-12-11-thinking-nonePublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 5 52.9%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. [variant] gpt-5-2-2025-12-11-thinking-xhighPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
GPQA Diamondreasoning 91.4%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] xhighPublished Dec 13, 2025
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
91.4 5 settings
- no reasoning 73.2%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] nonePublished Jul 13, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - low effort 82.7%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] lowPublished Dec 11, 2025
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - medium effort 87.9%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] mediumPublished Dec 11, 2025
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - high effort 88.2%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] highPublished Dec 11, 2025
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - xhigh effort 91.4%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] xhighPublished Dec 13, 2025
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
Open source ↗ 27.8
Open source ↗ 99.0
Open source ↗ 88.9
Open source ↗ 74.0
Open source ↗ 96.0
Open source ↗ 78.8
Open source ↗ 84.0
Open source ↗ 31.7
Open source ↗ 67.4
Open source ↗ 97.0
Open source ↗ 95.1
Open source ↗ 92.0
Open source ↗ 88.6
Open source ↗ 54.1
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025math 96.1%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] highPublished Dec 11, 2025
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
96.1 5 settings
- no reasoning 62.2%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] nonePublished Jul 13, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - low effort 78.9%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] lowPublished Dec 11, 2025
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - medium effort 93.9%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] mediumPublished Dec 11, 2025
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - high effort 96.1%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] highPublished Dec 11, 2025
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - xhigh effort 96.1%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] xhighPublished Dec 13, 2025
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
Open source ↗ 76.1
Open source ↗ 76.1
Open source ↗ 59.1
Open source ↗ 55.0
Open source ↗ 36.7
SWE-bench Pro (public)coding 29.9%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric resolve rate; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] public
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription
Open source ↗
29.9 2 settings
- Setting 1 29.9%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric resolve rate; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] public
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription
Open source ↗ - Setting 2 29.9%SWE-bench Pro (public)Published steward score [variant] Published Jan 27, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
SWE-bench Verifiedcoding 73.8%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] highPublished Feb 12, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
73.8 4 settings
- high effort 73.8%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] highPublished Feb 12, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - Setting 2 69%SWE-bench VerifiedSWE-bench published model plus agent result; harness retained, not a base model evaluation [variant] mini-SWE-agent; 1.17.2Published Dec 11, 2025
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 3 71.8%SWE-bench VerifiedSWE-bench published model plus agent result; harness retained, not a base model evaluation [variant] mini-SWE-agent; high; 1.17.2Published Dec 11, 2025
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 4 72.8%SWE-bench VerifiedSWE-bench published model plus agent result; harness retained, not a base model evaluation [variant] mini-SWE-agent; high; 2.0.0Published Feb 17, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
Open source ↗ 74.3
Normalization uses a fixed 0–100 scale for each unit, independent of other models. Compare evaluation conditions before reading a small gap as decisive. “Lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.
Details and sources
- Open weights
- Nomodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - License
- not yet reported
- Input modalities
- text, imagemodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - First seen by SuperIndex
- Oct 8, 2026
- Coverage
- 95% of expected source weight
Reported (8)
- ARC PrizeOct 8, 2026
- Epoch AI BenchmarkingOct 8, 2026
- Humanity’s Last ExamOct 8, 2026
- Official model cards via models.devOct 8, 2026
- LiveBenchOct 8, 2026
- LMArena / ArenaOct 8, 2026
- SWE-bench VerifiedOct 8, 2026
- SWE-bench Pro (public)Oct 8, 2026
Awaiting (1)
- Terminal-Bench5% of weight
Confidence rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models, so confidence reaches 100% at 80% of expected weight.