Moonshot AI, released Nov 6, 2025

Kimi K2 Thinking Turboprice, context, benchmarks and release details

Provisional: not enough results to rank yet Open weights 64% confidence 64 percent, Medium confidence, 2 of 7 expected sources in
66.1
SI Score
#32 of 142 ranked models
Input, per 1M tokens
not yet reported
Output, per 1M tokens
not yet reported
Context window
262Kmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Max output
262Kmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Released
Nov 6, 2025models.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗

How the score breaks down

Coding (weight 40 percent) —
Math (weight 15 percent) 83.1
Preference (weight 15 percent) 74.5
Reasoning (weight 30 percent) 84.2

Weights: reasoning 30%, math 15%, coding 40%, preference 15%. Results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging, and thin evidence is pulled toward 50. Method si-v3-retained-evidence-2, computed Oct 9, 2026, 05:13 UTC.

Around it on the leaderboard

  1. 30 GLM-5.3-Flash 66.2
  2. 31 DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 66.2
  3. 32 Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo 66.1
  4. 33 GPT-5.2 65.9
  5. 34 GLM-5.2 65.7

Full leaderboard

Benchmark results

3 benchmarks, 3 results

Each row shows the best published result. Where a model was tested at several settings, such as reasoning effort, open the row to see each one. Hover or tap a value for its source.

GPQA Diamondreasoning 84.2%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] Published Nov 11, 2025 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
84.2
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025math 83.1%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] Published Nov 13, 2025 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
83.1
LMArena Textpreference 1414.5 eloLMArena / ArenaPublished source fact [variant] text / overallPublished Oct 8, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY-4.0
Open source ↗
74.5

Normalization uses a fixed 0–100 scale for each unit, independent of other models. Compare evaluation conditions before reading a small gap as decisive. “Lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.

Details and sources

Open weights
Yesmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
License
not yet reported
Input modalities
textmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
First seen by SuperIndex
Oct 8, 2026
Coverage
51% of expected source weight

Reported (2)

  • Epoch AI BenchmarkingOct 8, 2026
  • LMArena / ArenaOct 8, 2026

Awaiting (5)

  • ARC Prize13% of weight
  • Humanity’s Last Exam13% of weight
  • Official model cards via models.dev4% of weight
  • LiveBench13% of weight
  • Terminal-Bench6% of weight

Confidence rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models, so confidence reaches 100% at 80% of expected weight.

What changed

All releases · RSS feed

Alerts on this device

What to be alerted about
RSS feed