Z.ai, released Jun 13, 2026
GLM-5.2price, context, benchmarks and release details
- Input, per 1M tokens
- $1.40Z.ai API pricingOfficial Z.ai global Standard uncached token rate; coding-plan subscriptions, cache and Batch excluded
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Output, per 1M tokens
- $4.40Z.ai API pricingOfficial Z.ai global Standard uncached token rate; coding-plan subscriptions, cache and Batch excluded
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Context window
- 1Mmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Max output
- 131Kmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Released
- Jun 13, 2026models.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
How the score breaks down
Weights: reasoning 30%, math 15%, coding 40%, preference 15%. Results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging, and thin evidence is pulled toward 50. Method si-v3-retained-evidence-2, computed Oct 9, 2026, 06:15 UTC.
Around it on the leaderboard
- 32 Kimi K2 Thinking Turbo 66.1
- 33 GPT-5.2 65.9
- 34 GLM-5.2 65.7
- 35 Gemini 3.6 Flash 65.5
- 36 Grok 4.7 65.5
Benchmark results
30 benchmarks, 38 resultsEach row shows the best published result. Where a model was tested at several settings, such as reasoning effort, open the row to see each one. Hover or tap a value for its source.
Open source ↗ 80.4
Open source ↗ 77.0
Open source ↗ 20.8
Open source ↗ 22.8
GPQA Diamondreasoning 91.9%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] maxPublished Jun 24, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
91.9 4 settings
- no reasoning 71.2%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] nonePublished Aug 10, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - low effort 87.9%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] lowPublished Aug 10, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - max effort 91.9%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] maxPublished Jun 24, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - Setting 4 91.2%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric accuracy; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] Published Jun 16, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription
Open source ↗
Open source ↗ 54.7
Open source ↗ 40.5
Open source ↗ 94.0
Open source ↗ 79.3
Open source ↗ 80.0
Open source ↗ 94.0
Open source ↗ 75.0
Open source ↗ 65.5
Open source ↗ 29.3
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 (v2)math 59.2%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] maxPublished Jun 19, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
59.2 3 settings
- no reasoning 42.5%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] nonePublished Aug 29, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - low effort 54.7%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] lowPublished Aug 29, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - max effort 59.2%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] maxPublished Jun 19, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
Open source ↗ 98.0
Open source ↗ 96.1
Open source ↗ 76.0
Open source ↗ 89.0
Open source ↗ 55.7
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025math 86.4%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] maxPublished Jun 25, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
86.4 3 settings
- no reasoning 28.9%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] nonePublished Aug 10, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - low effort 75.6%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] lowPublished Aug 10, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - max effort 86.4%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] maxPublished Jun 25, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
Open source ↗ 80.4
Open source ↗ 78.9
Open source ↗ 63.6
Open source ↗ 55.0
Open source ↗ 36.7
Open source ↗ 62.1
Open source ↗ 78.7
Terminal-Bench 2.1coding 82.7%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric success rate; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] Claude Code; 2.1Published Jun 16, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription
Open source ↗
82.7 2 settings
- Setting 1 82.7%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric success rate; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] Claude Code; 2.1Published Jun 16, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription
Open source ↗ - Setting 2 81%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric success rate; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] Terminus 2; 2.1Published Jun 16, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription
Open source ↗
Open source ↗ 79.4
Normalization uses a fixed 0–100 scale for each unit, independent of other models. Compare evaluation conditions before reading a small gap as decisive. “Lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.
Details and sources
- Open weights
- YesHugging Face HubPublic Hub repo with weight files; gating/repo upload date is not release date
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual metadata; model-specific licenses
Open source ↗ - License
- mitHugging Face HubPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual metadata; model-specific licenses
Open source ↗ - Input modalities
- textmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - First seen by SuperIndex
- Oct 8, 2026
- Coverage
- 81% of expected source weight
Reported (5)
- ARC PrizeOct 8, 2026
- Epoch AI BenchmarkingOct 8, 2026
- Official model cards via models.devOct 8, 2026
- LiveBenchOct 8, 2026
- LMArena / ArenaOct 8, 2026
Awaiting (2)
- Humanity’s Last Exam13% of weight
- Terminal-Bench6% of weight
Confidence rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models, so confidence reaches 100% at 80% of expected weight.