Alibaba / Qwen, released Apr 1, 2025

Qwen3 32Bprice, context, benchmarks and release details

Provisional: not enough results to rank yet Open weights 67% confidence 67 percent, Medium confidence, 3 of 8 expected sources in
50.4
SI Score
#106 of 142 ranked models
Input, per 1M tokens
$0.16Alibaba Model Studio pricingOfficial Alibaba Model Studio Global USD on-demand API; standard tier; Non-Thinking and Thinking modes. Output uses non-thinking rate when both modes are available; thinking-only products use their thinking rate. Cache, Batch, free quotas and regional rates excluded Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
Output, per 1M tokens
$0.64Alibaba Model Studio pricingOfficial Alibaba Model Studio Global USD on-demand API; standard tier; Non-Thinking and Thinking modes. Output uses non-thinking rate when both modes are available; thinking-only products use their thinking rate. Cache, Batch, free quotas and regional rates excluded Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
Context window
131Kmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Max output
16.4Kmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Released
Apr 1, 2025models.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗

How the score breaks down

Coding (weight 40 percent) 40.0
Math (weight 15 percent) 45.0
Preference (weight 15 percent) 66.8
Reasoning (weight 30 percent) 59.9

Weights: reasoning 30%, math 15%, coding 40%, preference 15%. Results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging, and thin evidence is pulled toward 50. Method si-v3-retained-evidence-2, computed Oct 9, 2026, 05:13 UTC.

Around it on the leaderboard

  1. 104 Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 51.0
  2. 105 GPT-5 Mini 50.6
  3. 106 Qwen3 32B 50.4
  4. 107 Qwen3 235B-A22B 50.3
  5. 108 Qwen3 Max 50.2

Full leaderboard

Benchmark results

4 benchmarks, 6 results

Each row shows the best published result. Where a model was tested at several settings, such as reasoning effort, open the row to see each one. Hover or tap a value for its source.

GPQA Diamondreasoning 65.7%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] Published Aug 28, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
65.7 2 settings
  • no reasoning 54.1%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] nonePublished Aug 30, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
    Open source ↗
  • Setting 2 65.7%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] Published Aug 28, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
    Open source ↗
About GPQA Diamond
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025math 66.9%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] Published Aug 30, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
66.9 2 settings
  • no reasoning 23.1%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] nonePublished Aug 30, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
    Open source ↗
  • Setting 2 66.9%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] Published Aug 30, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
    Open source ↗
About OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025
Aider Polyglotcoding 40%Aider polyglotPublished source fact [variant] Aider polyglot; 225 cases; 2 attemptsPublished May 8, 2025 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · Apache-2.0
Open source ↗
40.0
LMArena Textpreference 1340.1 eloLMArena / ArenaPublished source fact [variant] text / overallPublished Oct 8, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY-4.0
Open source ↗
66.8

Normalization uses a fixed 0–100 scale for each unit, independent of other models. Compare evaluation conditions before reading a small gap as decisive. “Lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.

Details and sources

Open weights
Yesmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
License
not yet reported
Input modalities
textmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
First seen by SuperIndex
Oct 8, 2026
Coverage
54% of expected source weight

Reported (3)

  • Aider polyglotOct 8, 2026
  • Epoch AI BenchmarkingOct 8, 2026
  • LMArena / ArenaOct 8, 2026

Awaiting (5)

  • ARC Prize12% of weight
  • Humanity’s Last Exam12% of weight
  • Official model cards via models.dev4% of weight
  • LiveBench12% of weight
  • Terminal-Bench6% of weight

Confidence rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models, so confidence reaches 100% at 80% of expected weight.

What changed

All releases · RSS feed

Alerts on this device

What to be alerted about
RSS feed