Alibaba / Qwen, released Apr 1, 2025
Qwen3 32Bprice, context, benchmarks and release details
- Input, per 1M tokens
- $0.16Alibaba Model Studio pricingOfficial Alibaba Model Studio Global USD on-demand API; standard tier; Non-Thinking and Thinking modes. Output uses non-thinking rate when both modes are available; thinking-only products use their thinking rate. Cache, Batch, free quotas and regional rates excluded
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Output, per 1M tokens
- $0.64Alibaba Model Studio pricingOfficial Alibaba Model Studio Global USD on-demand API; standard tier; Non-Thinking and Thinking modes. Output uses non-thinking rate when both modes are available; thinking-only products use their thinking rate. Cache, Batch, free quotas and regional rates excluded
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Context window
- 131Kmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Max output
- 16.4Kmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Released
- Apr 1, 2025models.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
How the score breaks down
Weights: reasoning 30%, math 15%, coding 40%, preference 15%. Results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging, and thin evidence is pulled toward 50. Method si-v3-retained-evidence-2, computed Oct 9, 2026, 05:13 UTC.
Around it on the leaderboard
- 104 Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 51.0
- 105 GPT-5 Mini 50.6
- 106 Qwen3 32B 50.4
- 107 Qwen3 235B-A22B 50.3
- 108 Qwen3 Max 50.2
Benchmark results
4 benchmarks, 6 resultsEach row shows the best published result. Where a model was tested at several settings, such as reasoning effort, open the row to see each one. Hover or tap a value for its source.
GPQA Diamondreasoning 65.7%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] Published Aug 28, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
65.7 2 settings
- no reasoning 54.1%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] nonePublished Aug 30, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - Setting 2 65.7%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] Published Aug 28, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025math 66.9%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] Published Aug 30, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
66.9 2 settings
- no reasoning 23.1%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] nonePublished Aug 30, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - Setting 2 66.9%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] Published Aug 30, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
Open source ↗ 40.0
Open source ↗ 66.8
Normalization uses a fixed 0–100 scale for each unit, independent of other models. Compare evaluation conditions before reading a small gap as decisive. “Lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.
Details and sources
- Open weights
- Yesmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - License
- not yet reported
- Input modalities
- textmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - First seen by SuperIndex
- Oct 8, 2026
- Coverage
- 54% of expected source weight
Reported (3)
- Aider polyglotOct 8, 2026
- Epoch AI BenchmarkingOct 8, 2026
- LMArena / ArenaOct 8, 2026
Awaiting (5)
- ARC Prize12% of weight
- Humanity’s Last Exam12% of weight
- Official model cards via models.dev4% of weight
- LiveBench12% of weight
- Terminal-Bench6% of weight
Confidence rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models, so confidence reaches 100% at 80% of expected weight.