Alibaba / Qwen, released Apr 2, 2026
Qwen3.6 Plusprice, context, benchmarks and release details
- Input, per 1M tokens
- $0.28Alibaba Model Studio pricingOfficial Alibaba Model Studio Global USD on-demand API; 0<Token≤256K; . Output uses non-thinking rate when both modes are available; thinking-only products use their thinking rate. Cache, Batch, free quotas and regional rates excluded
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Output, per 1M tokens
- $1.65Alibaba Model Studio pricingOfficial Alibaba Model Studio Global USD on-demand API; 0<Token≤256K; . Output uses non-thinking rate when both modes are available; thinking-only products use their thinking rate. Cache, Batch, free quotas and regional rates excluded
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Context window
- 1Mmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Max output
- 65.5Kmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Released
- Apr 2, 2026models.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
How the score breaks down
Weights: reasoning 30%, math 15%, coding 40%, preference 15%. Results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging, and thin evidence is pulled toward 50. Method si-v3-retained-evidence-2, computed Oct 9, 2026, 05:13 UTC.
Around it on the leaderboard
- 54 Qwen3.8 27B 61.9
- 55 GPT-6 Luna 61.6
- 56 Qwen3.6 Plus 61.6
- 57 GLM-4.7 61.3
- 58 GPT-5.4 Pro 61.3
Benchmark results
21 benchmarks, 22 resultsEach row shows the best published result. Where a model was tested at several settings, such as reasoning effort, open the row to see each one. Hover or tap a value for its source.
Open source ↗ 88.4
Open source ↗ 90.5
Open source ↗ 67.0
Open source ↗ 70.0
Open source ↗ 98.0
Open source ↗ 67.3
Open source ↗ 68.0
FrontierMath Tiers 1–3 (v2)math 38.2%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] Published Aug 30, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
38.2 2 settings
- no reasoning 32.3%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] nonePublished Aug 29, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - Setting 2 38.2%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] Published Aug 30, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
Open source ↗ 97.0
Open source ↗ 93.1
Open source ↗ 62.0
Open source ↗ 82.8
Open source ↗ 51.6
Open source ↗ 93.3
Open source ↗ 76.1
Open source ↗ 80.3
Open source ↗ 59.1
Open source ↗ 45.0
Open source ↗ 20.0
Open source ↗ 57.9
Open source ↗ 76.5
Normalization uses a fixed 0–100 scale for each unit, independent of other models. Compare evaluation conditions before reading a small gap as decisive. “Lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.
Details and sources
- Open weights
- Nomodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - License
- not yet reported
- Input modalities
- text, image, videomodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - First seen by SuperIndex
- Oct 8, 2026
- Coverage
- 64% of expected source weight
Reported (3)
- Epoch AI BenchmarkingOct 8, 2026
- LiveBenchOct 8, 2026
- LMArena / ArenaOct 8, 2026
Awaiting (4)
- ARC Prize13% of weight
- Humanity’s Last Exam13% of weight
- Official model cards via models.dev4% of weight
- Terminal-Bench6% of weight
Confidence rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models, so confidence reaches 100% at 80% of expected weight.