DeepSeek, released Apr 24, 2026
DeepSeek V4 Flashprice, context, benchmarks and release details
- Input, per 1M tokens
- $0.30LiteLLMFirst-party API Standard token rate; MIT LiteLLM transcription. Provider documentation: https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing. Exact endpoint only; cache/batch/long-context rates excluded
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Output, per 1M tokens
- $1.20LiteLLMFirst-party API Standard token rate; MIT LiteLLM transcription. Provider documentation: https://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing. Exact endpoint only; cache/batch/long-context rates excluded
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Context window
- 1Mmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Max output
- 384Kmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Released
- Apr 24, 2026models.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
How the score breaks down
Weights: reasoning 30%, math 15%, coding 40%, preference 15%. Results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging, and thin evidence is pulled toward 50. Method si-v3-retained-evidence-2, computed Oct 9, 2026, 06:15 UTC.
Around it on the leaderboard
- 77 LongCat-2.0 56.6
- 78 MiMo-V2.5 56.4
- 79 DeepSeek V4 Flash 56.2
- 80 Fugu 55.9
- 81 MiMo-V2.6-Flash 55.8
Benchmark results
24 benchmarks, 24 resultsEach row shows the best published result. Where a model was tested at several settings, such as reasoning effort, open the row to see each one. Hover or tap a value for its source.
Open source ↗ 88.1
Open source ↗ 34.8
Open source ↗ 45.1
Open source ↗ 89.5
Open source ↗ 59.9
Open source ↗ 64.0
Open source ↗ 96.0
Open source ↗ 73.1
Open source ↗ 49.3
Open source ↗ 86.2
Open source ↗ 98.0
Open source ↗ 97.1
Open source ↗ 37.0
Open source ↗ 86.5
Open source ↗ 54.0
Open source ↗ 65.2
Open source ↗ 73.2
Open source ↗ 54.5
Open source ↗ 35.0
Open source ↗ 23.3
Open source ↗ 52.6
Open source ↗ 79.0
Open source ↗ 56.9
Open source ↗ 76.1
Normalization uses a fixed 0–100 scale for each unit, independent of other models. Compare evaluation conditions before reading a small gap as decisive. “Lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.
Details and sources
- Open weights
- Yesmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - License
- not yet reported
- Input modalities
- textmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - First seen by SuperIndex
- Oct 8, 2026
- Coverage
- 43% of expected source weight
Reported (3)
- Official model cards via models.devOct 8, 2026
- LiveBenchOct 8, 2026
- LMArena / ArenaOct 8, 2026
Awaiting (4)
- ARC Prize13% of weight
- Epoch AI Benchmarking25% of weight
- Humanity’s Last Exam13% of weight
- Terminal-Bench6% of weight
Confidence rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models, so confidence reaches 100% at 80% of expected weight.