Google, released Mar 3, 2026

Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Previewprice, context, benchmarks and release details

Provisional: not enough results to rank yet 48% confidence 48 percent, Low confidence, 2 of 7 expected sources in
42.6
SI Score
Not ranked yet
Input, per 1M tokens
$0.25LiteLLMFirst-party API Standard token rate; MIT LiteLLM transcription. Provider documentation: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing. Exact endpoint only; cache/batch/long-context rates excluded Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Output, per 1M tokens
$1.50LiteLLMFirst-party API Standard token rate; MIT LiteLLM transcription. Provider documentation: https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing. Exact endpoint only; cache/batch/long-context rates excluded Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Context window
1Mmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Max output
65.5Kmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Released
Mar 3, 2026models.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗

How the score breaks down

Coding (weight 40 percent) —
Math (weight 15 percent) —
Preference (weight 15 percent) 74.6
Reasoning (weight 30 percent) 8.6

Weights: reasoning 30%, math 15%, coding 40%, preference 15%. Results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging, and thin evidence is pulled toward 50. Method si-v3-retained-evidence-2, computed Oct 9, 2026, 06:15 UTC.

Around it on the leaderboard

  1. 1 Claude Fable 5.1 80.2
  2. 2 Claude Opus 5.5 78.4
  3. 3 GPT-6 Astra 77.5
  4. 4 Claude Fable 5 76.8
  5. 5 Claude Opus 5 74.9

Full leaderboard

Benchmark results

2 benchmarks, 2 results

Each row shows the best published result. Where a model was tested at several settings, such as reasoning effort, open the row to see each one. Hover or tap a value for its source.

Humanity's Last Exam (Scale AI)reasoning 8.6%Humanity’s Last ExamPotential contamination warning: This model was evaluated after the public release of HLE, allowing model builder access to the prompts and solutions. [variant] Published Mar 23, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
8.6
LMArena Textpreference 1415.8 eloLMArena / ArenaPublished source fact [variant] text / overallPublished Oct 8, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY-4.0
Open source ↗
74.6

Normalization uses a fixed 0–100 scale for each unit, independent of other models. Compare evaluation conditions before reading a small gap as decisive. “Lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.

Details and sources

Open weights
Nomodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
License
not yet reported
Input modalities
text, image, video, audio, pdfmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
First seen by SuperIndex
Oct 8, 2026
Coverage
38% of expected source weight

Reported (2)

  • Humanity’s Last ExamOct 8, 2026
  • LMArena / ArenaOct 8, 2026

Awaiting (5)

  • ARC Prize13% of weight
  • Epoch AI Benchmarking25% of weight
  • Official model cards via models.dev4% of weight
  • LiveBench13% of weight
  • Terminal-Bench6% of weight

Confidence rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models, so confidence reaches 100% at 80% of expected weight.

What changed

All releases · RSS feed

Alerts on this device

What to be alerted about
RSS feed