Meta, released Apr 5, 2025
Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instructprice, context, benchmarks and release details
- Input, per 1M tokens
- not yet reported
- Output, per 1M tokens
- not yet reported
- Context window
- 1Mmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Max output
- 16.4Kmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Released
- Apr 5, 2025models.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
How the score breaks down
Weights: reasoning 30%, math 15%, coding 40%, preference 15%. Results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging, and thin evidence is pulled toward 50. Method si-v3-retained-evidence-2, computed Oct 9, 2026, 05:13 UTC.
Around it on the leaderboard
- 138 Llama-3.2-1B 32.1
- 139 GPT-4.1 nano 32.1
- 140 GPT-4o 31.2
- 141 Llama 4 Maverick 17B Instruct 30.0
- 142 GPT-4o mini 22.9
Benchmark results
10 benchmarks, 11 resultsEach row shows the best published result. Where a model was tested at several settings, such as reasoning effort, open the row to see each one. Hover or tap a value for its source.
Open source ↗ 7.1
Open source ↗ 4.4
Open source ↗ 0.0
Open source ↗ 0.0
Open source ↗ 67.0
Open source ↗ 5.7
Open source ↗ 73.0
Open source ↗ 20.6
Open source ↗ 15.6
SWE-bench Pro (public)coding 5.2%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric resolve rate; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] public
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription
Open source ↗
5.2 2 settings
- Setting 1 5.2%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric resolve rate; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] public
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription
Open source ↗ - Setting 2 5.2%SWE-bench Pro (public)Published steward score [variant] Published Jan 27, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
Normalization uses a fixed 0–100 scale for each unit, independent of other models. Compare evaluation conditions before reading a small gap as decisive. “Lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.
Details and sources
- Open weights
- Yesmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - License
- not yet reported
- Input modalities
- text, imagemodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - First seen by SuperIndex
- Oct 8, 2026
- Coverage
- 63% of expected source weight
Reported (6)
- Aider polyglotOct 8, 2026
- ARC PrizeOct 8, 2026
- Epoch AI BenchmarkingOct 8, 2026
- Humanity’s Last ExamOct 8, 2026
- Official model cards via models.devOct 8, 2026
- SWE-bench Pro (public)Oct 8, 2026
Awaiting (3)
- LiveBench11% of weight
- LMArena / Arena21% of weight
- Terminal-Bench5% of weight
Confidence rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models, so confidence reaches 100% at 80% of expected weight.