MiniMax, released Oct 27, 2025

MiniMax-M2price, context, benchmarks and release details

Provisional: not enough results to rank yet Open weights 96% confidence 96 percent, High confidence, 3 of 4 expected sources in
55.7
SI Score
#84 of 142 ranked models
Input, per 1M tokens
$0.30MiniMax API pricingOfficial MiniMax global on-demand API; lowest short-context tier and displayed permanent promotional discount; excludes high-context, fast tier and subscriptions Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
Output, per 1M tokens
$1.20MiniMax API pricingOfficial MiniMax global on-demand API; lowest short-context tier and displayed permanent promotional discount; excludes high-context, fast tier and subscriptions Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
Context window
205Kmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Max output
131Kmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Released
Oct 27, 2025models.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗

How the score breaks down

Coding (weight 40 percent) 64.5
Math (weight 15 percent) —
Preference (weight 15 percent) 66.8
Reasoning (weight 30 percent) —

Weights: reasoning 30%, math 15%, coding 40%, preference 15%. Results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging, and thin evidence is pulled toward 50. Method si-v3-retained-evidence-2, computed Oct 9, 2026, 05:13 UTC.

Around it on the leaderboard

  1. 82 DeepSeek V3 0324 55.7
  2. 83 GPT-5 55.7
  3. 84 MiniMax-M2 55.7
  4. 85 GPT-5.1 55.7
  5. 86 Qwen3.6 27B 55.6

Full leaderboard

Benchmark results

2 benchmarks, 3 results

Each row shows the best published result. Where a model was tested at several settings, such as reasoning effort, open the row to see each one. Hover or tap a value for its source.

SWE-bench Verifiedcoding 69.4%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric resolved; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription
Open source ↗
69.4 2 settings
  • Setting 1 69.4%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric resolved; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription
    Open source ↗
  • Setting 2 61%SWE-bench VerifiedSWE-bench published model plus agent result; harness retained, not a base model evaluation [variant] mini-SWE-agent; 1.17.0Published Nov 24, 2025 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
    Open source ↗
About SWE-bench Verified
LMArena Textpreference 1339.9 eloLMArena / ArenaPublished source fact [variant] text / overallPublished Oct 8, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY-4.0
Open source ↗
66.8

Normalization uses a fixed 0–100 scale for each unit, independent of other models. Compare evaluation conditions before reading a small gap as decisive. “Lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.

Details and sources

Open weights
Yesmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
License
not yet reported
Input modalities
textmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
First seen by SuperIndex
Oct 8, 2026
Coverage
77% of expected source weight

Reported (3)

  • Official model cards via models.devOct 8, 2026
  • LMArena / ArenaOct 8, 2026
  • SWE-bench VerifiedOct 8, 2026

Awaiting (1)

  • LiveBench23% of weight

Confidence rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models, so confidence reaches 100% at 80% of expected weight.

What changed

All releases · RSS feed

Alerts on this device

What to be alerted about
RSS feed