Moonshot AI, released Jun 12, 2026
Kimi K2.7 Codeprice, context, benchmarks and release details
- Input, per 1M tokens
- $0.95models.devFirst-party hosted API; MIT models.dev transcription. Provider documentation: https://platform.moonshot.ai/docs/api/chat. Exact canonical endpoint; lowest short-context Standard USD token tier; cache/batch discounts excluded. Deprecated endpoints excluded; moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Output, per 1M tokens
- $4.00models.devFirst-party hosted API; MIT models.dev transcription. Provider documentation: https://platform.moonshot.ai/docs/api/chat. Exact canonical endpoint; lowest short-context Standard USD token tier; cache/batch discounts excluded. Deprecated endpoints excluded; moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Context window
- 262Kmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Max output
- 262Kmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Released
- Jun 12, 2026models.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
How the score breaks down
Weights: reasoning 30%, math 15%, coding 40%, preference 15%. Results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging, and thin evidence is pulled toward 50. Method si-v3-retained-evidence-2, computed Oct 9, 2026, 06:15 UTC.
Around it on the leaderboard
- 1 Claude Fable 5.1 80.2
- 2 Claude Opus 5.5 78.4
- 3 GPT-6 Astra 77.5
- 4 Claude Fable 5 76.8
- 5 Claude Opus 5 74.9
Benchmark results
20 benchmarks, 20 resultsEach row shows the best published result. Where a model was tested at several settings, such as reasoning effort, open the row to see each one. Hover or tap a value for its source.
Open source ↗ 87.9
Open source ↗ 98.0
Open source ↗ 48.3
Open source ↗ 74.0
Open source ↗ 92.0
Open source ↗ 69.2
Open source ↗ 96.0
Open source ↗ 12.2
Open source ↗ 54.0
Open source ↗ 97.0
Open source ↗ 94.1
Open source ↗ 37.0
Open source ↗ 90.3
Open source ↗ 49.8
Open source ↗ 95.6
Open source ↗ 76.1
Open source ↗ 71.8
Open source ↗ 63.6
Open source ↗ 50.0
Open source ↗ 23.3
Normalization uses a fixed 0–100 scale for each unit, independent of other models. Compare evaluation conditions before reading a small gap as decisive. “Lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.
Details and sources
- Open weights
- YesHugging Face HubPublic Hub repo with weight files; gating/repo upload date is not release date
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual metadata; model-specific licenses
Open source ↗ - License
- otherHugging Face HubPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual metadata; model-specific licenses
Open source ↗ - Input modalities
- text, image, videomodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - First seen by SuperIndex
- Oct 8, 2026
- Coverage
- 38% of expected source weight
Reported (2)
- Epoch AI BenchmarkingOct 8, 2026
- LiveBenchOct 8, 2026
Awaiting (5)
- ARC Prize13% of weight
- Humanity’s Last Exam13% of weight
- Official model cards via models.dev4% of weight
- LMArena / Arena25% of weight
- Terminal-Bench6% of weight
Confidence rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models, so confidence reaches 100% at 80% of expected weight.