OpenAI, released Apr 14, 2025
GPT-4.1 miniprice, context, benchmarks and release details
- Input, per 1M tokens
- $0.40models.devFirst-party hosted API; MIT models.dev transcription. Provider documentation: https://platform.openai.com/docs/models. Exact canonical endpoint; lowest short-context Standard USD token tier; cache/batch discounts excluded. Deprecated endpoints excluded; openai/gpt-4.1-mini
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Output, per 1M tokens
- $1.60models.devFirst-party hosted API; MIT models.dev transcription. Provider documentation: https://platform.openai.com/docs/models. Exact canonical endpoint; lowest short-context Standard USD token tier; cache/batch discounts excluded. Deprecated endpoints excluded; openai/gpt-4.1-mini
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Context window
- 1Mmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Max output
- 32.8Kmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Released
- Apr 14, 2025models.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
How the score breaks down
Weights: reasoning 30%, math 15%, coding 40%, preference 15%. Results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging, and thin evidence is pulled toward 50. Method si-v3-retained-evidence-2, computed Oct 9, 2026, 05:13 UTC.
Around it on the leaderboard
- 130 Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 37.7
- 131 Nova Pro 37.4
- 132 GPT-4.1 mini 36.9
- 133 GPT-4o (2024-08-06) 36.7
- 134 Nova Lite 36.6
Benchmark results
11 benchmarks, 11 resultsEach row shows the best published result. Where a model was tested at several settings, such as reasoning effort, open the row to see each one. Hover or tap a value for its source.
Open source ↗ 7.2
Open source ↗ 3.5
Open source ↗ 0.0
Open source ↗ 0.0
Open source ↗ 65.8
Open source ↗ 6.7
Open source ↗ 87.3
Open source ↗ 44.7
Open source ↗ 32.4
Open source ↗ 23.9
Open source ↗ 66.9
Normalization uses a fixed 0–100 scale for each unit, independent of other models. Compare evaluation conditions before reading a small gap as decisive. “Lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.
Details and sources
- Open weights
- Nomodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - License
- not yet reported
- Input modalities
- text, image, pdfmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - First seen by SuperIndex
- Oct 8, 2026
- Coverage
- 70% of expected source weight
Reported (5)
- Aider polyglotOct 8, 2026
- ARC PrizeOct 8, 2026
- Epoch AI BenchmarkingOct 8, 2026
- LMArena / ArenaOct 8, 2026
- SWE-bench VerifiedOct 8, 2026
Awaiting (4)
- Humanity’s Last Exam11% of weight
- Official model cards via models.dev4% of weight
- LiveBench11% of weight
- Terminal-Bench5% of weight
Confidence rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models, so confidence reaches 100% at 80% of expected weight.