OpenAI, released Jan 14, 2026
GPT-5.2 Codexprice, context, benchmarks and release details
- Input, per 1M tokens
- not yet reported
- Output, per 1M tokens
- not yet reported
- Context window
- 400Kmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Max output
- 128Kmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Released
- Jan 14, 2026OpenAI API changelogPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
How the score breaks down
Weights: reasoning 30%, math 15%, coding 40%, preference 15%. Results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging, and thin evidence is pulled toward 50. Method si-v3-retained-evidence-2, computed Oct 9, 2026, 06:15 UTC.
Around it on the leaderboard
- 1 Claude Fable 5.1 80.2
- 2 Claude Opus 5.5 78.4
- 3 GPT-6 Astra 77.5
- 4 Claude Fable 5 76.8
- 5 Claude Opus 5 74.9
Benchmark results
18 benchmarks, 19 resultsEach row shows the best published result. Where a model was tested at several settings, such as reasoning effort, open the row to see each one. Hover or tap a value for its source.
Open source ↗ 95.0
Open source ↗ 89.0
Open source ↗ 68.0
Open source ↗ 94.0
Open source ↗ 78.8
Open source ↗ 70.0
Open source ↗ 98.0
Open source ↗ 95.1
Open source ↗ 75.0
Open source ↗ 87.0
Open source ↗ 60.6
Open source ↗ 87.0
Open source ↗ 80.3
Open source ↗ 68.2
Open source ↗ 60.0
Open source ↗ 20.0
SWE-bench Pro (public)coding 41.0%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric resolve rate; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] public
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription
Open source ↗
41.0 2 settings
- Setting 1 41.0%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric resolve rate; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] public
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription
Open source ↗ - Setting 2 41.0%SWE-bench Pro (public)Published steward score [variant] Published Jan 27, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
Open source ↗ 72.8
Normalization uses a fixed 0–100 scale for each unit, independent of other models. Compare evaluation conditions before reading a small gap as decisive. “Lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.
Details and sources
- Open weights
- Nomodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - License
- not yet reported
- Input modalities
- text, image, pdfmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - First seen by SuperIndex
- Oct 8, 2026
- Coverage
- 34% of expected source weight
Reported (4)
- Official model cards via models.devOct 8, 2026
- LiveBenchOct 8, 2026
- SWE-bench VerifiedOct 8, 2026
- SWE-bench Pro (public)Oct 8, 2026
Awaiting (5)
- ARC Prize10% of weight
- Epoch AI Benchmarking20% of weight
- Humanity’s Last Exam10% of weight
- LMArena / Arena20% of weight
- Terminal-Bench5% of weight
Confidence rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models, so confidence reaches 100% at 80% of expected weight.