Anthropic, released May 28, 2026
Claude Opus 4.8price, context, benchmarks and release details
- Input, per 1M tokens
- $5.00Anthropic API pricingOfficial Claude API base tokens; lowest short-context global Standard rate; cache, batch, fast and regional premiums excluded
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Output, per 1M tokens
- $25.00Anthropic API pricingOfficial Claude API base tokens; lowest short-context global Standard rate; cache, batch, fast and regional premiums excluded
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Context window
- 1Mmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Max output
- 128Kmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Released
- May 28, 2026models.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
How the score breaks down
Weights: reasoning 30%, math 15%, coding 40%, preference 15%. Results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging, and thin evidence is pulled toward 50. Method si-v3-retained-evidence-2, computed Oct 9, 2026, 05:13 UTC.
Around it on the leaderboard
- 24 GLM-5.3 67.7
- 25 Claude Sonnet 5 67.7
- 26 Claude Opus 4.8 67.5
- 27 Grok 4.6 66.6
- 28 Inkling 66.5
Benchmark results
30 benchmarks, 39 resultsEach row shows the best published result. Where a model was tested at several settings, such as reasoning effort, open the row to see each one. Hover or tap a value for its source.
ARC-AGI-1 (semi-private)reasoning 92.5%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with 'max' output effort. [variant] anthropic-opus-4-8-maxPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
92.5 4 settings
- Setting 1 92%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with 'high' output effort. [variant] anthropic-opus-4-8-highPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 2 88%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with 'low' output effort. [variant] anthropic-opus-4-8-lowPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 3 92.5%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with 'max' output effort. [variant] anthropic-opus-4-8-maxPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 4 91.5%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with 'medium' output effort. [variant] anthropic-opus-4-8-mediumPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
ARC-AGI-2 (semi-private)reasoning 72.1%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with 'high' output effort. [variant] anthropic-opus-4-8-highPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
72.1 3 settings
- Setting 1 72.1%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with 'high' output effort. [variant] anthropic-opus-4-8-highPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 2 62.2%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with 'low' output effort. [variant] anthropic-opus-4-8-lowPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Setting 3 71.7%ARC PrizeARC Prize steward-published result; exact edition/subset; publication time is HTTP Last-Modified of the aggregate export, not the evaluation date. Evaluation conducted with 'medium' output effort. [variant] anthropic-opus-4-8-mediumPublished Oct 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗
Open source ↗ 1.5
GPQA Diamondreasoning 91.0%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] maxPublished Jun 7, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
91.0 3 settings
- no reasoning 85.4%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] nonePublished Aug 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - low effort 88.4%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] lowPublished Aug 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - max effort 91.0%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] maxPublished Jun 7, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
Open source ↗ 49.8
Open source ↗ 57.9
Open source ↗ 99.3
Open source ↗ 52.9
Open source ↗ 78.0
Open source ↗ 98.0
Open source ↗ 80.8
Open source ↗ 100.0
Open source ↗ 56.1
Open source ↗ 80.0
Open source ↗ 98.0
Open source ↗ 98.0
Open source ↗ 89.0
Open source ↗ 92.2
Open source ↗ 62.0
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025math 98.3%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] maxPublished Jun 7, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
98.3 3 settings
- no reasoning 84.4%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] nonePublished Aug 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - low effort 97.8%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] lowPublished Aug 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - max effort 98.3%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] maxPublished Jun 7, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
Open source ↗ 84.8
Open source ↗ 78.9
Open source ↗ 68.2
Open source ↗ 50.0
Open source ↗ 33.3
Open source ↗ 69.2
Open source ↗ 88.6
Open source ↗ 74.6
Open source ↗ 23.6
Open source ↗ 78.1
Normalization uses a fixed 0–100 scale for each unit, independent of other models. Compare evaluation conditions before reading a small gap as decisive. “Lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.
Details and sources
- Open weights
- Nomodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - License
- not yet reported
- Input modalities
- text, image, pdfmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - First seen by SuperIndex
- Oct 8, 2026
- Coverage
- 87% of expected source weight
Reported (6)
- ARC PrizeOct 8, 2026
- Epoch AI BenchmarkingOct 8, 2026
- Official model cards via models.devOct 8, 2026
- LiveBenchOct 8, 2026
- LMArena / ArenaOct 8, 2026
- Terminal-BenchOct 8, 2026
Awaiting (1)
- Humanity’s Last Exam13% of weight
Confidence rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models, so confidence reaches 100% at 80% of expected weight.