Anthropic, released Jun 30, 2026
Claude Sonnet 5price, context, benchmarks and release details
- Input, per 1M tokens
- $2.00Anthropic API pricingOfficial Claude API base tokens; lowest short-context global Standard rate; cache, batch, fast and regional premiums excluded
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Output, per 1M tokens
- $10.00Anthropic API pricingOfficial Claude API base tokens; lowest short-context global Standard rate; cache, batch, fast and regional premiums excluded
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation
Open source ↗ - Context window
- 1Mmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Max output
- 128Kmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Released
- Jun 30, 2026models.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
How the score breaks down
Weights: reasoning 30%, math 15%, coding 40%, preference 15%. Results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging, and thin evidence is pulled toward 50. Method si-v3-retained-evidence-2, computed Oct 9, 2026, 06:15 UTC.
Around it on the leaderboard
- 23 MiniMax-M3 68.0
- 24 GLM-5.3 67.7
- 25 Claude Sonnet 5 67.7
- 26 Claude Opus 4.8 67.5
- 27 Grok 4.6 66.6
Benchmark results
25 benchmarks, 27 resultsEach row shows the best published result. Where a model was tested at several settings, such as reasoning effort, open the row to see each one. Hover or tap a value for its source.
GPQA Diamondreasoning 90.5%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] xhighPublished Jul 1, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
90.5 2 settings
- xhigh effort 90.5%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] xhighPublished Jul 1, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - max effort 80.3%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] maxPublished Aug 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
Open source ↗ 95.5
Open source ↗ 74.7
Open source ↗ 86.0
Open source ↗ 100.0
Open source ↗ 80.8
Open source ↗ 88.0
Open source ↗ 29.3
Open source ↗ 65.6
Open source ↗ 98.0
Open source ↗ 95.1
Open source ↗ 88.0
Open source ↗ 90.7
Open source ↗ 60.6
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025math 94.7%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] xhighPublished Jul 1, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
94.7 2 settings
- xhigh effort 94.7%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] xhighPublished Jul 1, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗ - max effort 80%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] maxPublished Aug 6, 2026
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
Open source ↗ 78.3
Open source ↗ 83.1
Open source ↗ 68.2
Open source ↗ 60.0
Open source ↗ 50.0
Open source ↗ 63.2
Open source ↗ 85.2
Open source ↗ 80.4
Open source ↗ 12.4
Open source ↗ 77.0
Normalization uses a fixed 0–100 scale for each unit, independent of other models. Compare evaluation conditions before reading a small gap as decisive. “Lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.
Details and sources
- Open weights
- Nomodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - License
- not yet reported
- Input modalities
- text, image, pdfmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - First seen by SuperIndex
- Oct 8, 2026
- Coverage
- 75% of expected source weight
Reported (5)
- Epoch AI BenchmarkingOct 8, 2026
- Official model cards via models.devOct 8, 2026
- LiveBenchOct 8, 2026
- LMArena / ArenaOct 8, 2026
- Terminal-BenchOct 8, 2026
Awaiting (2)
- ARC Prize13% of weight
- Humanity’s Last Exam13% of weight
Confidence rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models, so confidence reaches 100% at 80% of expected weight.