Meta, released Apr 5, 2025

Llama 4 Scout 17B Instructprice, context, benchmarks and release details

Provisional: not enough results to rank yet Open weights 64% confidence, 2 of 7 expected sources in

51.0

SI Score

#104 of 142 ranked models

Input, per 1M tokens: not yet reported
Output, per 1M tokens: not yet reported
Context window: 10M
Max output: 16.4K
Released: Apr 5, 2025

How the score breaks down

Coding —

Math 44.1

Preference 59.8

Reasoning 51.8

Weights: reasoning 30%, math 15%, coding 40%, preference 15%. Results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging, and thin evidence is pulled toward 50. Method si-v3-retained-evidence-2, computed Oct 9, 2026, 05:13 UTC.

Around it on the leaderboard

102 Claude Opus 4.1 51.5
103 o4-mini 51.2
104 Llama 4 Scout 17B Instruct 51.0
105 GPT-5 Mini 50.6
106 Qwen3 32B 50.4

Full leaderboard

Benchmark results

4 benchmarks, 4 results

Each row shows the best published result. Where a model was tested at several settings, such as reasoning effort, open the row to see each one. Hover or tap a value for its source.

GPQA Diamondreasoning 51.8% 51.8

MATH Level 5math 62.3% 62.3

OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025math 7.8% 7.8

LMArena Textpreference 1279.2 elo 59.8

Normalization uses a fixed 0–100 scale for each unit, independent of other models. Compare evaluation conditions before reading a small gap as decisive. “Lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.

Details and sources

Open weights: Yes
License: not yet reported
Input modalities: text, image
First seen by SuperIndex: Oct 8, 2026
Coverage: 51% of expected source weight

Reported (2)

Epoch AI BenchmarkingOct 8, 2026
LMArena / ArenaOct 8, 2026

Awaiting (5)

ARC Prize13% of weight
Humanity’s Last Exam13% of weight
Official model cards via models.dev4% of weight
LiveBench13% of weight
Terminal-Bench6% of weight

Confidence rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models, so confidence reaches 100% at 80% of expected weight.