Meta, released Jul 23, 2024
Llama-3.1-8B-Instructprice, context, benchmarks and release details
- Input, per 1M tokens
- not yet reported
- Output, per 1M tokens
- not yet reported
- Context window
- 128Kmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Max output
- 4.1Kmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - Released
- Jul 23, 2024models.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
How the score breaks down
Weights: reasoning 30%, math 15%, coding 40%, preference 15%. Results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging, and thin evidence is pulled toward 50. Method si-v3-retained-evidence-2, computed Oct 9, 2026, 05:13 UTC.
Around it on the leaderboard
- 128 Gemma 3 4B IT 39.2
- 129 GPT-5 Nano 39.1
- 130 Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 37.7
- 131 Nova Pro 37.4
- 132 GPT-4.1 mini 36.9
Benchmark results
4 benchmarks, 4 resultsEach row shows the best published result. Where a model was tested at several settings, such as reasoning effort, open the row to see each one. Hover or tap a value for its source.
Open source ↗ 27.0
Open source ↗ 22.9
Open source ↗ 1.7
Open source ↗ 48.3
Normalization uses a fixed 0–100 scale for each unit, independent of other models. Compare evaluation conditions before reading a small gap as decisive. “Lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.
Details and sources
- Open weights
- Yesmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - License
- not yet reported
- Input modalities
- textmodels.devPublished source fact
Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗ - First seen by SuperIndex
- Oct 8, 2026
- Coverage
- 75% of expected source weight
Reported (2)
- Epoch AI BenchmarkingOct 8, 2026
- LMArena / ArenaOct 8, 2026
Awaiting (2)
- Official model cards via models.dev7% of weight
- LiveBench19% of weight
Confidence rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models, so confidence reaches 100% at 80% of expected weight.