Meta, released Jul 23, 2024

Llama-3.1-8B-Instructprice, context, benchmarks and release details

Provisional: not enough results to rank yet Open weights 93% confidence 93 percent, High confidence, 2 of 4 expected sources in
37.7
SI Score
#130 of 142 ranked models
Input, per 1M tokens
not yet reported
Output, per 1M tokens
not yet reported
Context window
128Kmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Max output
4.1Kmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Released
Jul 23, 2024models.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗

How the score breaks down

Coding (weight 40 percent) —
Math (weight 15 percent) 15.8
Preference (weight 15 percent) 48.3
Reasoning (weight 30 percent) 27.0

Weights: reasoning 30%, math 15%, coding 40%, preference 15%. Results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging, and thin evidence is pulled toward 50. Method si-v3-retained-evidence-2, computed Oct 9, 2026, 05:13 UTC.

Around it on the leaderboard

  1. 128 Gemma 3 4B IT 39.2
  2. 129 GPT-5 Nano 39.1
  3. 130 Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct 37.7
  4. 131 Nova Pro 37.4
  5. 132 GPT-4.1 mini 36.9

Full leaderboard

Benchmark results

4 benchmarks, 4 results

Each row shows the best published result. Where a model was tested at several settings, such as reasoning effort, open the row to see each one. Hover or tap a value for its source.

GPQA Diamondreasoning 27.0%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] Published Aug 27, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
27.0
MATH Level 5math 22.9%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] Published Jan 27, 2025 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
22.9
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025math 1.7%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] Published Aug 27, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
1.7
LMArena Textpreference 1186.6 eloLMArena / ArenaPublished source fact [variant] text / overallPublished Oct 8, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY-4.0
Open source ↗
48.3

Normalization uses a fixed 0–100 scale for each unit, independent of other models. Compare evaluation conditions before reading a small gap as decisive. “Lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.

Details and sources

Open weights
Yesmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
License
not yet reported
Input modalities
textmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
First seen by SuperIndex
Oct 8, 2026
Coverage
75% of expected source weight

Reported (2)

  • Epoch AI BenchmarkingOct 8, 2026
  • LMArena / ArenaOct 8, 2026

Awaiting (2)

  • Official model cards via models.dev7% of weight
  • LiveBench19% of weight

Confidence rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models, so confidence reaches 100% at 80% of expected weight.

What changed

All releases · RSS feed

Alerts on this device

What to be alerted about
RSS feed