Mistral AI, released Nov 18, 2024

Mistral Large 2.1price, context, benchmarks and release details

Provisional: not enough results to rank yet Open weights 100% confidence 100 percent, Full confidence, 3 of 4 expected sources in
35.3
SI Score
#135 of 142 ranked models
Input, per 1M tokens
not yet reported
Output, per 1M tokens
not yet reported
Context window
131Kmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Max output
16.4Kmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
Released
Nov 18, 2024models.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗

How the score breaks down

Coding (weight 40 percent) 6.1
Math (weight 15 percent) 36.1
Preference (weight 15 percent) 58.1
Reasoning (weight 30 percent) 51.3

Weights: reasoning 30%, math 15%, coding 40%, preference 15%. Results use fixed 0–100 scales before averaging, and thin evidence is pulled toward 50. Method si-v3-retained-evidence-2, computed Oct 9, 2026, 05:13 UTC.

Around it on the leaderboard

  1. 133 GPT-4o (2024-08-06) 36.7
  2. 134 Nova Lite 36.6
  3. 135 Mistral Large 2.1 35.3
  4. 136 Mistral Medium 3 33.0
  5. 137 Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct 32.7

Full leaderboard

Benchmark results

5 benchmarks, 5 results

Each row shows the best published result. Where a model was tested at several settings, such as reasoning effort, open the row to see each one. Hover or tap a value for its source.

GPQA Diamondreasoning 51.3%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] Published Feb 25, 2025 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
51.3
MATH Level 5math 50.3%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] Published Feb 25, 2025 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
50.3
OTIS Mock AIME 2024–2025math 7.8%Epoch AI BenchmarkingEpoch-owned evaluation mean score; scores only, no benchmark questions [variant] Published Feb 25, 2025 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY
Open source ↗
7.8
Terminal-Benchcoding 6.1%Official model cards via models.devLab-reported; metric success rate; transcribed by MIT models.dev catalog; not independently evaluated [variant] Published Mar 11, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · factual citation; MIT transcription
Open source ↗
6.1
LMArena Textpreference 1265.3 eloLMArena / ArenaPublished source fact [variant] text / overallPublished Oct 8, 2026 Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · CC-BY-4.0
Open source ↗
58.1

Normalization uses a fixed 0–100 scale for each unit, independent of other models. Compare evaluation conditions before reading a small gap as decisive. “Lab-reported” marks the provider's own published figure.

Details and sources

Open weights
Yesmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
License
not yet reported
Input modalities
textmodels.devPublished source fact Retrieved Oct 9, 2026 · MIT
Open source ↗
First seen by SuperIndex
Oct 8, 2026
Coverage
81% of expected source weight

Reported (3)

  • Epoch AI BenchmarkingOct 8, 2026
  • Official model cards via models.devOct 8, 2026
  • LMArena / ArenaOct 8, 2026

Awaiting (1)

  • LiveBench19% of weight

Confidence rises as pending sources publish. Some sources never cover some models, so confidence reaches 100% at 80% of expected weight.

What changed

All releases · RSS feed

Alerts on this device

What to be alerted about
RSS feed